Media/News Coverage on Affirmative Action

Below are some clips that show various news networks addressing affirmative action.

                                                                                        The Five on Fox News:This segment of the show addresses the policies of affirmative action and "social injustice", and how the modern education system uses these ideas to instruct American students. It also talks about about a book, "The Cultural Proficiency Journey: Moving Beyond Ethical Barriers Toward Profound School Change" by F C Jones - a book based on the concept of "white privilege".

                                                                               Scholarships for whites only on CNN: This segment starts out by discussing a new non-profit organization, the Former Majority Association for Equality, initiated in Texas that grants scholarships to only white males who maintain an average of a 3.0 grade point average (GPA).  Erick Erickson, a CNN contributor, and April D. Ryan, White House correspondent for the America Urban Radio Network, go head in head to debate over affirmative action.

                                                                             

Immigration, Affirmative Action on New High Court Docket; Health Reform Awaited on: PBS: This news bulletin talks about various controversial issues in America today. Immigration and affirmative action are two of its topics, so this video can also be used for my information on the Great Immigration War. Listen to what people have to say on these two topics. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now next are some articles on affirmative action: supporting it and opposing it. 
This first article is by Ward Connerly, founder and President of the American Civil Rights Institute and an advocate against affirmative action. His quote, "Race has no place in American life or law," expresses his belief that affirmative action is a form of racism, and preferential treatment should not be used against whites or be in favor for women and minorities. Read ahead as Connerly expresses his views.

What Happened to Post-Racial America?

Few government policies have had the reach, immortality and consequences of affirmative action. A policy that could be justified at its start, affirmative action has now become yesterday's solution to yesterday's problem. Yet it endures as if nothing has happened in the past 50 years.

There is an interracial man—although self-identified "African-American"—occupying the White House, blacks are on our courts, including the highest court in the land, blacks are mayors of major cities and heads of American corporations.

Notwithstanding all this, President Barack Obama, who was elected largely because Americans thought he would lead the nation to a Promised Land of post-racialism, recently signed Executive Order 13583 "to promote Diversity and Inclusion in the Federal Workforce." The irony is that few institutions in America are more "diverse" and "inclusive" than the federal government, where the workforce is 17% black while blacks are roughly 13% of the U.S. population.

In addition to the president's executive order, the Dodd-Frank financial-reform law included Section 342, promoted by Rep. Maxine Waters (D., Calif.), which should be called the "White Male Exclusion Act." It establishes in all federal financial regulatory agencies an "Office of Minority and Women Inclusion" with responsibility for "diversity in management, employment and business activities."

It is doubtful that anyone can name a government agency that does not include an affirmative-action office or "diversity" department in its structure. The infrastructure of the diversity network is vast.

More than anything else, the pursuit of diversity overshadows and subordinates excellence and competence and often makes us content with mediocrity. The late economist Milton Friedman once told me that "Freedom to compete fairly for university admissions, jobs and contracts is central to all that America professes to be."

In a recent column on these pages, Stanford's Shelby Steele observed that "the values that made us exceptional have been smeared with derision. . . . Talk of 'merit' or 'a competition of excellence' in the admissions office of any Ivy League university today and then stand by for the howls of academic laughter." As a former regent of the University of California, I can confirm that these howls, and worse, are not confined to the Ivy League.

When former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor ruled in the 2003 Grutter v. Bollinger decision that the use of race preferences was constitutional while in the pursuit of diversity, she offered the hope that such preferences would no longer be necessary by 2028. Eight years later, the federal government is moving further away from Justice O'Connor's goal, not closer.

The longer we allow preferences to endure in the guise of diversity, the more damage will be done to the nation. If the president is serious about America rededicating itself to our ideals—which are liberty, economic opportunity for all, individual merit and the principle of equality—then he should begin with rescinding his executive order on affirmative action, calling on Congress to repeal Section 342 of Dodd-Frank, and paring back the burdensome and redundant diversity network that exists within the federal government.

Finally, he should urge Americans to embrace the color-blind vision of John F. Kennedy, who said that "race has no place in American life or law, and of Martin Luther King Jr., who dreamed of the day when the color of his children's skin would be subordinate to the content of their character.
This next article was written in response to Ward Connerly's by different interest groups. 

Affirmative Action Is Still Needed for Racial Equality

Regarding Ward Connerly's "What Happened to Post-Racial America?" (op-ed, Oct. 4): Having a black man as the president of the U.S. or the head of a corporation doesn't prove there's a level playing field in American society. If there were, the unemployment rate for blacks and Hispanics wouldn't be significantly higher than for whites, and women wouldn't be paid significantly less than their male counterparts.

To Mr. Connerly, the federal government's equal opportunity programs apparently work a little too well. Otherwise, how could blacks be overrepresented in the federal work force—by a modest 4% above their share of the population? That's nothing, however, compared to the number of industries where women and minorities are severely underrepresented, like on Wall Street. Studies by the Government Accountability Office show that a lack of sustained commitment on the part of Wall Street has resulted in limited diversity in senior management positions, which is why Rep. Maxine Waters's legislation aimed at ensuring everyone has access to opportunities while improving diversity is so necessary.

Finally, Mr. Connerly also offers no proof for his assertion that equal opportunity initiatives and a focus on diversity lead inexorably to a mediocrity that is damaging the nation. He continues to misconstrue the Grutter v. Bollinger decision regarding diversity in education. To quote the Supreme Court, "In order to cultivate a set of leaders with legitimacy in the eyes of the citizenry, it is necessary that the path to leadership be visibly open to talented and qualified individuals of every race and ethnicity."

Wade Henderson

President and CEO

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights

Washington

Ward Connerly conveniently ignores evidence that discrimination and inequality continue to block access to even the most basic opportunities that every American should be able to expect. Considering race by itself is not the cure-all for the inequalities that persist in America today. But the fact remains that programs considering race have been successful in improving prospects for people of color, women and others who have been denied opportunity historically and even today.

The true state of bias and inequality in America is told in the numerous studies and statistics showing that African-Americans and Latinos are almost a third more likely to get a high-priced loan than white borrowers with the same credit scores, or that African-Americans with no criminal record are less likely to be called back for a job interview than similarly qualified whites with a felony conviction. The current median wealth of white households is now 20 times that of black households and 18 times that of Hispanics—the most lopsided it has been since the government began publishing data a quarter-century ago. Black and Hispanic unemployment is twice that of whites, and blacks are 70% more likely to lose their homes to foreclosures.

All of these are stark reminders that even if the disease of discrimination and inequality is in some ways less virulent than it has been in the past, it is premature to pronounce it cured. Eliminating affirmative action would be a tragedy which would only move us further from the goals of fairness and excellence that Mr. Connerly claims to support.

Dennis Parker

American Civil Liberties Union

New York
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------